Integration by parts: integrating a product
- By parts is the product rule run backwards.
- A product of two unrelated functions (, , ) could only have come from differentiating a product, so this is the tool to use.
- The most important choice is which factor you call .
The formula and the choice of u
(textbook 8.6, Key Point 8.4)
- You choose (the part you differentiate) and (the part you integrate).
- Pick to be the part that gets simpler when you differentiate it, and that you could not easily integrate anyway.
A rule you can use without thinking: if or is there, that is (you cannot integrate them nicely). Otherwise = the power of .
Common mistake
Worked example
9709/31 Nov 2024 Q2:
- is present → take , .
- Then and .
- Apply: ; the leftover is now trivial.
(9709/31 Nov 2024 Q2) wants the answer “in the form .” Work out the bracket at both limits and show it clearly; that bracket is worth a method mark. The full value is .
Worked example
9709/33 Jun 2020 Q2: : the other u
Now there is no or , so the rule says = the polynomial, and the exponential is the part you integrate.
- Take , . Then and .
- Apply the formula: .
- The leftover is now a one-line integral. Combine the two brackets.
(9709/33 Jun 2020 Q2). The choice is the whole question: with no log here, the -polynomial is the part that gets simpler when you differentiate, so it is .
Why “differentiate the part that gets simpler” is the right rule
By parts swaps your integral for a new one . That swap only helps if the new integral is easier. Differentiating a power of drops its degree (), heading towards a constant. Differentiating or turns them into algebraic fractions you can actually integrate. So you pick to be whatever shrinks when you differentiate it. That is the part you want gone from the next integral.
∫ ln x dx: write it as 1 · ln x
- Integrating on its own looks impossible, until you see it is really a product.
Write , then take and (so ):
(textbook Worked Example 8.17). The same move handles .
Your turn— tap to reveal the worked answer (9709/31 Nov 2025 Q1)
“Find the exact value of in the form .” Write it as , take () and : . That gives , and the log laws fold it down to:
(9709/31 Nov 2025 Q1). Same move as . The only extra step is folding with log laws.
Applying it twice
- When is a higher power of (like or ), one pass turns into but still leaves a product behind.
- Do by parts a second time on that leftover. The power drops to a constant and it finishes.
Common mistake
∫ x tan⁻¹ x dx: one question using all the methods
- This exam type comes up again and again. It uses almost every method in the chapter.
Take (you cannot integrate it) and , so . By parts:
- The leftover uses the derivative from §8.2.
- After a quick tidy-up, it finishes as minus an arctan.
Worked example
9709/32 Nov 2025 Q4: : the chapter in one question
- is present → it is ; , so and .
- By parts: .
- Tidy the leftover with , so it integrates to .
- Put it together: .
(9709/32 Nov 2025 Q4). One question, three chapter skills: the by-parts choice of , the arctan derivative (§8.2), and the divide-first tidy-up.
Your turn— tap to reveal the worked answer (9709/32 Jun 2025 Q10(b))
The same move on the version: “Find the exact value of ” (also set in 9709/31 Jun 2024 Q10(b)). Take so , then the same divide-first tidy-up on finishes it. (9709/32 Jun 2025 Q10)