Further trigonometric identities
- Proving an identity is not the same as solving. You rewrite one side until it turns into the other.
- Never move terms across the sign.
- Start on the messier side, open it up with the compound and double angle formulae, then tidy until it matches.
Work on one side only, usually the busier one. Three moves handle almost every proof: open up compound/double angles into and , choose the form that cancels the awkward term, and split the fraction to bring out simple ratios.
Expand the messy side, then simplify
- Open up any compound or double angle into and .
- Choose the form that cancels the awkward term (leaves a clean square).
- Split the fraction to bring out simple ratios like and .
Worked examples
Worked example
Prove
- Choose the cos form that makes a clean square on top: .
- Expand the bottom with the double angle: , giving .
- Cancel top and bottom: . ✓
Worked example
Real question: prove
9709/32 M/J 2021 Q6(a). First put both reciprocals over the one bottom, . Then a double angle finishes it.
- Write both terms over the same bottom: .
- On top, pick the form that makes a clean square: . On the bottom, .
- So . ✓
Why examiners always add a part (b)
The proof is never the real question
Part (a) proves . Part (b) of that same paper then asks you to integrate . That looks impossible. But (a) lets you swap the whole mess for , and . (9709/32 Jun 2021 Q6)
That is why proofs are on this paper: they let you swap a hard thing to integrate for an easy one. When you see “prove this identity, hence integrate”, use the proved form in the integral.
Where the marks go
Common mistake
Common mistake
Now you try
Show that . (9709-style)
Your turn— tap to reveal the worked answer (9709-style)
The left side is a difference of two squares: .
The second bracket is , and the first is exactly the form: