Implicit Differentiation
- Some curves cannot be written as . Here and are tangled together, like .
- You can still differentiate. There is one new idea, and it is just the chain rule again.
is a function of you can't see, so counts as an “inside.” So every time you differentiate a -term, the chain rule adds a on the end: .
The fixed 4-step recipe
- Differentiate both sides term by term with respect to . For a -term use the chain rule (the tag); for a mixed -term use the product rule.
- Collect every term on one side, everything else on the other.
- Factor out .
- Divide to get in terms of and .
- The answer really does contain both and . That is normal for implicit curves, not a mistake. (Worked Example 4.12)
Worked example
9709/32 Jun 2023 Q7: show for
- Differentiate each term. . The needs the product rule: . The needs the chain rule: . RHS: .
- So .
- Collect the terms and factor: .
- Divide, then cancel the shared factor of : .
This is a “show that”, so the answer is printed. That means every mark is in the tagged steps: the on the -terms and the two product-rule pieces on . Never skip them. (9709/32 May/June 2023 Q7)
Worked example
Real question: , show
9709/31 M/J 2023 Q5(a). The constant is just a number, so treat it like one, and watch the two mixed -terms.
- is a product: . The uses the chain rule: . RHS is constant, so .
- So .
- Collect and factor: .
- Divide, then flip both signs to match the printed form: .
Multiplying top and bottom by matches the printed answer, and examiners expect it. (9709/31 May/June 2023 Q5)
Common mistake
- Forgetting the tag on a -term — writing instead of . This is THE implicit mistake.
- Treating a mixed term as one piece. is a product, so — two terms, not one.
- Algebra slips when collecting and factoring .
Using dy/dx: gradients, tangents, stationary points
- For a gradient at a point you need both coordinates: plug in and (usually given).
- For a tangent or normal, find the gradient there, then write the usual line.
- For a horizontal tangent, set the top of to zero; for a vertical tangent, set the bottom to zero, then solve it together with the curve.
Worked example
Real question: , show no horizontal tangent exists
9709/32 F/M 2024 Q6. Part (a) gives ; part (b) asks why the curve is never flat.
- A horizontal tangent needs the top to vanish: .
- Solve that together with the curve. Sub into ; it reduces to a quadratic in whose discriminant is negative.
- No real satisfies both, so the gradient is never zero: the curve has no tangent parallel to the -axis.
“Show it never happens” means “show the equations have no real solution”. A negative discriminant is the cleanest proof. (9709/32 Feb/March 2024 Q6)
Your turn— tap to reveal the worked answer (9709/31 May/June 2022 Q8)
; express in terms of and . Differentiate (the is a product): .
- Implicit also mixes with logs and exponentials, such as (9709-style) and (9709-style). But the steps never change.